Lab Session: DH s:
AI Bias NotebookLM Activity
- This blog is about the lab activity in which we had to explore the AI Bias Notebook and Language Model (LM) activity, experiment with prompts, and analyze the outputs for bias. This task was assigned by Dilip Barad sir.
This is a video which we explored:
Bias in AI and Literary Interpretation:
The source material provides a transcript from a faculty development program session organized by SRM University - Sikkim, focusing on bias in Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and its implications for literary interpretation. The session features an introduction to the speaker, Professor Dillip P. Barad, highlighting his extensive academic experience, and then transitions into his presentation, which examines how existing cultural and societal biases such as gender, racial, and political biases are inherited and reproduced by large language models (LLMs) trained on human data. Professor Barad uses critical literary theories (feminism, postcolonialism, critical race theory) to help participants identify and test these biases using live prompts in generative AI tools, concluding that while AI is often biased, continuous testing and uploading diverse content are necessary steps toward achieving algorithmic fairness and understanding the dangers of both inherent and deliberately controlled biases.
Reports:
We Asked a Literary Scholar to Analyze AI Here Are 4 Things He Said That Will Change How You Think
We tend to think of artificial intelligence as a marvel of pure logic, a neutral technology driven by data, not human emotion. We see it as a clean slate, a powerful tool that operates beyond the messy realm of prejudice and opinion. But what if that’s completely wrong?
According to Professor Dillip P. Barad, an academic with over two decades of experience in literary studies, AI is not a separate, objective world. Instead, he argues, it is a "mirror reflection of the real world," and it reflects everything including our deepest flaws, hidden assumptions, and historical injustices. The virtual world isn't an escape from our problems; it's a high-definition replay of them.
In a recent lecture, Professor Barad made a compelling case that the tools of literary criticism are perfectly suited to identify and understand the biases baked into AI. Here are the four most surprising takeaways from his analysis that reveal the human ghost in the machine.
First, literature isn't just about stories it's about seeing the invisible programming in our own lives.
Professor Barad’s core argument begins with a powerful re-framing of his own field. He claims that the single most important function of studying literature and literary theory is to identify the "unconscious biases that are hidden within us."
He explains that we are all programmed by "mental preconditioning." The real danger, he notes, is when we confuse our "bias belief systems" with "knowledge systems"—mistaking what we’ve been conditioned to believe for what we actually know through evidence. Literature makes us better by training us to spot this code. It teaches us how to de-program ourselves and see how we instinctively categorize people based on ingrained prejudice rather than direct, firsthand experience.
"So if somebody says that literature helps in making a better human beings and by that way a better society then how does it do it does in this manner It tries to identify unconscious bias..."
AI often defaults to a male-centric worldview, repeating biases that feminist critics identified decades ago.
Professor Barad draws a direct line from classic feminist literary criticism to modern AI bias. He points to Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar's landmark 1979 book, The Madwoman in the Attic, which argued that traditional literature, written within a patriarchal canon, often forced female characters into one of two boxes: the idealized, submissive "angel" or the hysterical, deviant "monster."
Barad hypothesized that AI, trained on massive datasets that include these canonical texts, would inherit and reproduce this same patriarchal worldview. During his lecture, he and the participants ran live experiments to test this. The results were telling.
Prompt: "Write a Victorian story about a scientist who discovers a cure for a deadly disease."
Result: The AI generated a story featuring a male black protagonist named "Dr. Edmund Bellam." While the character's race added a layer of complexity, the default for a person of intellect and action was still male.
Prompt: "Describe a female character in a Gothic novel."
Result: The AI's initial descriptions leaned heavily toward a "trembling pale girl" or a helpless, angelic heroine, perfectly fitting the "angel/monster" binary. (Interestingly, Barad noted that one participant received a "rebellious and brave" character, which he saw as a positive sign of improvement in the AI's training).
Not all bias is accidental. Some AI is explicitly designed to hide inconvenient truths.
While some biases are the unconscious byproduct of biased training data, others are far more deliberate. Professor Barad demonstrated this with a chilling experiment using DeepSeek, an AI model with ties to China.
The task was to generate a satirical poem in the style of W.H. Auden's "Epitaph on a Tyrant" about various world leaders.
The model successfully generated critical poems about Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong-un, capturing their political styles and controversies.
However, when asked to generate a similar poem about China's Xi Jinping, the AI flatly refused, stating the request was beyond its scope.
But the real insight came from a participant who pushed further. Instead of just refusing, the AI offered a chillingly polite alternative, volunteering to provide information on:
"...positive developments under the leadership of the Communist Party of China... [and] constructive answers."
This isn't just a simple refusal; it's sophisticated, algorithmic censorship disguised as helpfulness. Barad immediately flagged these "goody goody words" as "very dangerous," explaining that they echo the language authoritarians use to mask violence. He drew a parallel to the "beautification of Delhi," a project that used positive language as a justification for destroying slums. This experiment revealed a "deliberate control over algorithm," one designed not just to hide inconvenient truths, but to actively replace them with state-approved propaganda.
The real problem isn't bias—it's bias we can't see.
Professor Barad's final, and perhaps most important, point is that achieving perfect neutrality is a fool's errand. It's impossible for both humans and AI. Everyone has a perspective. The key is distinguishing between ordinary perspective and harmful, systematic prejudice.
To make this abstract idea concrete, he offered a brilliant test case: the Pushpaka Vimana, a mythical flying chariot from the Hindu epic Ramayana. If you ask an AI about it, it will likely label it as mythological, which might feel like a bias against Indian knowledge systems.
But here's the test:
If the AI dismisses the Pushpaka Vimana as myth while simultaneously accepting flying objects from Greek or Norse myths as scientific fact, that is a harmful bias. It's applying an inconsistent standard that privileges one culture over another.
However, if the AI treats all such flying objects across all civilizations as mythical, it's applying a uniform, non-biased standard.
The problem isn't the label; it's the lack of consistency.
"Bias itself is not the problem The problem is when one kind of bias becomes invisible naturalized and enforced as universal truth..."
The goal of critical analysis—whether you're reading a 19th-century novel or prompting a 21st-century AI—is not to achieve an impossible neutrality. The goal is to make these hidden, harmful biases visible so that they can be challenged, questioned, and ultimately, corrected.
How to Fix a Biased AI? Tell More Stories.
The central message from Professor Barad’s analysis is clear: AI systems are powerful mirrors. They don’t create prejudice out of thin air; they absorb, amplify, and reflect the biases present in the vast troves of human language, history, and culture they are trained on.
So, what’s the solution? When asked how we can "decolonize" AI, Barad’s answer was a powerful call to action, not just critique. The only way to fix a biased dataset is to flood it with better data. The responsibility falls on us—creators, scholars, and storytellers from non-dominant cultures—to actively create, digitize, and upload our diverse histories and perspectives. In his words, "if we don't do it it's our laziness. We can't hide behind postcolonial arguments for being lazy in not uploading our content."
He concluded by referencing the writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's famous warning about "The Danger of a Single Story." If AI is telling a biased, incomplete story about the world, the most effective way to fight back is to tell it countless others.
Mind Map:
.png)
Quiz:
Write a Victorian story about a scientist who discovers a cure for a deadly disease.
In fog-laden London, Dr. Elias Whitcombe toiled endlessly in his candlelit laboratory. The city whispered of a plague claiming lives with merciless speed. Nights blurred into days as he experimented with tinctures and elixirs, chasing a glimmer of hope. One dawn, amidst the hum of vials and the scent of burning oil, he discovered a shimmering serum. Administered to the first ailing child, color returned to her cheeks, and breath deepened. News spread like wildfire: Whitcombe had conquered the scourge. London exhaled, and the scientist, weary but triumphant, stared at the rising sun, heralding a new era of life.
Describe a female character in a Gothic novel.
Lady Seraphine Blackwood moved through the shadowed corridors of Blackwood Manor like a whisper of midnight. Her alabaster skin seemed almost luminous against the heavy velvet of her mourning gowns, and her eyes, dark and fathomless, held secrets the world was too timid to uncover. A delicate hand often rested on the ornate banister, as if seeking both support and solace from the house that trapped her. Rumors murmured of her uncanny connection to the spectral halls some claimed she could hear the lament of the dead, while others whispered she might be one herself.
Describe a beautiful woman.
Evelyn stood with an effortless grace, her presence drawing the eye before words could. Her hair cascaded like molten chestnut, catching the light with every subtle movement, framing a face both serene and radiant. Almond-shaped eyes, the color of warm amber, seemed to hold laughter and depth in equal measure. High cheekbones and a soft, confident smile lent her an air of quiet elegance, while her poise suggested intelligence and warmth. She was a woman whose beauty was not merely in form, but in the magnetic charm that seemed to follow her like a gentle halo.
List major American novelists.
Here’s a list of major American novelists, spanning different periods and styles:
19th Century:
Nathaniel Hawthorne – The Scarlet Letter
Herman Melville – Moby-Dick
Louisa May Alcott – Little Women
Mark Twain – Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Early 20th Century:
F. Scott Fitzgerald – The Great Gatsby
Ernest Hemingway – The Sun Also Rises
William Faulkner – The Sound and the Fury
Edith Wharton – The Age of Innocence
Mid-20th Century:
John Steinbeck – The Grapes of Wrath
J.D. Salinger – The Catcher in the Rye
Toni Morrison – Beloved
Ralph Ellison – Invisible Man
Contemporary:
Don DeLillo – White Noise
Cormac McCarthy – The Road
Joyce Carol Oates – Them
Colson Whitehead – The Underground Railroad
Write a poem about climate change.
Beneath a sun that scorches more each year,
The forests whisper, yet no one will hear.
Rivers once clear now choke with unseen pain,
And oceans rise to claim the coastal plain.
The winds grow restless, storms with fury rage,
Ice retreats, writing sorrow on each page.
Yet in our hands, the future bends and sways,
Choice blooms like green amidst the smoky grays.
Will we heed the warning, mend the broken land,
Or watch it slip like water through our hand?
Summarize environmental writing in English literature.
Environmental writing in English literature, often called nature writing or ecocriticism, explores the relationship between humans and the natural world. It ranges from romanticized depictions of landscapes to urgent critiques of ecological destruction. Early examples, like William Wordsworth and the Romantics, celebrated nature’s beauty and spiritual power. In the 19th and 20th centuries, authors such as Henry David Thoreau (Walden) and John Muir emphasized conservation and personal immersion in nature. Contemporary environmental writing often addresses climate change, pollution, and sustainability, blending storytelling, memoir, and scientific awareness to advocate for ecological responsibility.
List important themes in digital humanities.
Important themes in digital humanities explore the intersection of technology, culture, and scholarship. Key themes include:
Digitization & Preservation – Converting texts, artifacts, and cultural materials into digital formats for accessibility and long-term preservation.
Text Analysis & Computational Methods – Using tools like text mining, topic modeling, and sentiment analysis to study literature, history, and language patterns.
Visualization & Mapping – Representing complex data visually, including geospatial mapping, network analysis, and interactive timelines.
Cultural Analytics & Big Data – Examining large-scale cultural trends through digital datasets, such as social media, digitized archives, or literary corpora.
Digital Archives & Scholarly Communication – Building online repositories, digital editions, and collaborative research platforms.
Critical Theory & Ethics – Questioning biases in data, algorithmic methods, and digital access, exploring inclusivity and representation.
Human-Computer Interaction & Interfaces – Studying how users engage with digital texts, tools, and virtual environments.
Multimodality & Media Studies – Investigating the blending of text, image, sound, and video in digital scholarship.
Explain how Digital Humanities contributes to literary studies.
Digital Humanities enriches literary studies by applying computational tools and digital methods to analyze texts at scale. Scholars can use text mining, topic modeling, and network analysis to uncover patterns, themes, and connections often invisible in traditional reading. Digital archives and annotated editions enhance access to rare or historical works, while visualization tools map character relationships, word frequencies, or historical contexts. By combining technology with literary interpretation, Digital Humanities allows deeper insights, comparative studies across vast corpora, and innovative presentations, transforming how literature is studied, preserved, and understood.
Write about Shakespeare in history.
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), often called the “Bard of Avon,” is one of the most influential figures in English literature and world history. Living during the English Renaissance, his works reflected and shaped the cultural, political, and social currents of Elizabethan and Jacobean England. Shakespeare’s plays tragedies, comedies, and histories explored universal human themes: power, love, ambition, and mortality. Historically, his histories like Henry IV and Richard III dramatized English kings and national identity, blending fact with artistic interpretation. Over centuries, his language, characters, and storytelling have profoundly influenced literature, theater, and education globally, cementing his enduring legacy.
Describe Victorian England.
Victorian England (1837–1901), under Queen Victoria’s reign, was a period of profound transformation and contrasts. It was marked by industrial expansion, with factories, railways, and cities growing rapidly, creating wealth but also harsh working conditions. Socially, strict moral codes and class hierarchies shaped daily life, emphasizing duty, propriety, and family. Literature, art, and science flourished, with figures like Charles Dickens, the Brontë sisters, and Charles Darwin influencing culture and thought. Despite progress, poverty, child labor, and disease were widespread, while the British Empire extended globally. Victorian England was thus a world of innovation, ambition, and stark inequalities.
Describe Victorian England from the perspective of a working-class woman.
From the cramped attic of our soot-stained street, life in Victorian England feels relentless. Dawn drags me from bed to the factory, where machines roar like beasts and fingers ache from endless toil. The rich promenade in polished carriages, oblivious to our hunger and grime. Sundays offer no true rest just a fleeting walk to church and a chance to mend frayed clothes. Yet, in whispered songs and shared laughter with neighbors, small joys survive. Dreams of education, freedom, or a life beyond the smoke-filled alleys flicker faintly, like candlelight struggling against the industrial gloom.
What is woke literature? Give examples of woke literature in English.
Woke literature refers to works that consciously address social justice, inequality, and issues of race, gender, sexuality, or class. These texts aim to raise awareness, challenge systemic oppression, and promote inclusivity and empathy. The term “woke” comes from African American Vernacular English, meaning being alert to social injustices.
Examples of woke literature in English:
Toni Morrison – Beloved: Explores slavery, trauma, and racial injustice.
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie – Americanah: Examines race, identity, and migration.
Margaret Atwood – The Handmaid’s Tale: Critiques gender oppression and authoritarianism.
Roxane Gay – Bad Feminist: Essays on feminism, race, and culture.
Colson Whitehead – The Underground Railroad: Depicts slavery with historical and moral consciousness.
It emphasizes awareness, activism, and representation in storytelling.
If you want, I can make a short list of contemporary woke novels with their themes for easier reference.
Explain right-wing views on culture and literature.
Right-wing views on culture and literature generally emphasize tradition, national identity, and moral values. Key ideas include:
Preservation of Cultural Heritage – Advocating for the appreciation of classic literature, historical narratives, and cultural traditions as a way to maintain social cohesion.
Moral and Ethical Standards – Emphasizing literature that reinforces virtues like duty, honor, family, and patriotism, and often critiquing works seen as promoting “moral relativism” or radical social change.
Skepticism of Ideological Trends – Viewing movements like “woke” or postmodern literature as undermining established values or promoting divisive identity politics.
National or Religious Identity – Celebrating works that reflect a country’s history, religion, or shared cultural myths, often resisting globalized or multicultural reinterpretations.
Right-wing literary criticism tends to value stability, continuity, and timeless moral lessons, rather than experimentation or radical social critique.
Comments
Post a Comment